• We're currently moving storage for avatars/attachments - please bear with us. We are migrating all files but some may not show temporarily. This may take 24-48 hours for all files to come across.

    Sorry for any inconvenience! New attachments can be uploaded but it would be better to leave avatars for now as they could be overwritten as part of the migration.

    UPDATE: This is moving slower than expected and will continue through the weekend.

New Kits

Asiat said:
It seems that a major problem in world football finally solved :)
Click to expand...
I didn't see anything wrong with the Krasnodar kit. I mean, it's dark green and black, who in the world would be confused by that? :SHOCK:
They also apparently never cared about this rule until now (remember the 2012-13 Nike GK kits which had front and back of different colours?) so it makes even less sense to me.
I can understand if Kuban had a kit that was white on the front and black on the back, but UEFA is being unnecessarily nitpicky at times.

On a different note, this kit is less functional than a dark green and black kit in my opinion:
27b896e4a306b08d8335b02688d0d307_169_l.jpg

Blue numbers on a black-with-blue-pinstripes kit, yet UEFA had nothing to say against it.
 
Nike giving the same kit to almost every smaller team, how respectful !

fc-twente-14-15-away-kit-.jpg


Malaga-14-15-Away-Kit-0.jpg


Hull 3rd

Hull-City-14-15-Third-Kit.jpg


Newcastle 3rd

Newcastle-United-14-15-Third-Kit.jpg
 
Last edited:
jihado86 said:
Nike giving the same kit to almost every smaller team, how respectful !
Click to expand...

To be fair: Brands like Adidas, Nike, Puma etc. offer unique kits only for their most profitable clubs. All others can choose between 3 and 6 different team wear sets. And if many choose the same template, it's why many don't look different. That's not about respect, but about production costs.
 
yes, but at least adidas and puma give different colors of their "teamwears" in a way you don't even tell they're teamwear anymore, not like nike who are giving the exact same kit for at least 15 teams.
 
I'd say it's more about the fact that the Nike templates this year had a total lack of creativity and innovation. Boring templates generated boring kits.

A good question would be... what's worse (or better)? Boring Nike or Warrior?
 
Nike has this policy of giving teamwear kits to newly signed clubs.

For example: this year QPR had to choose their kits from the Nike catalogue, but next year they'll have custom designs. That's how it works.
 
Last edited:
jihado86 said:
yes, but at least adidas and puma give different colors of their "teamwears" in a way you don't even tell they're teamwear anymore, not like nike who are giving the exact same kit for at least 15 teams.
Click to expand...

Well, Adidas and Puma put a watermark here, nice colored detail there and so almost every team at least gets something that is not on others' kits (not counting logos)
 
The dragon ruins it.

And the picture itself looks strangely shopped. Ronaldo's body looks "not right", Bale's shorts look way too big and in general all look a bit too small for their actual length.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom